Speaking of changes....

Brian Wallace brian_c_wallace@yahoo.com
Tue, 15 Apr 2003 10:22:00 -0700 (PDT)


Both Peggy and Dan make a lot of good points.  If I
had the time I would ruminate on them.

How's this for a change?  Not only is Christina Santi-
ago not on the cover of the June issue.  She's not
even mentioned on the cover!  It just says "Playmate
of the Year  REVEALED!"

Now as Playboy traditions go, making a somewhat big
deal about the Playmate of the Year was the last one
left.  It's the only thing fans of Playboy speculate
about any more.

I'm not saying this is a seachange, but at the
Playmate of the Year "coming out" party at the
mansion, they always take a picture of the lucky gal
in front of her cover.  What will they do this year?
Take a picture of her in front of a cover she's not
on?

Topic: "James Kaminsky's devaluation of the Playmate
of the Year"

Discuss.

Brian Wallace

P.S.  I could see this if there was a sudden change 
of mind regarding the Playmate of the Year.  But as
we know, it's been accepted that it's Christina Santi-
ago for months.

P.P.S.  The preview picture at the end of the May
issue is NOT in the June Playmate of the Year pic-
torial which supports my theory that that photo
is of Michelle Rodgers.

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com