Speaking of changes....
Brian Wallace
brian_c_wallace@yahoo.com
Tue, 15 Apr 2003 10:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
Both Peggy and Dan make a lot of good points. If I
had the time I would ruminate on them.
How's this for a change? Not only is Christina Santi-
ago not on the cover of the June issue. She's not
even mentioned on the cover! It just says "Playmate
of the Year REVEALED!"
Now as Playboy traditions go, making a somewhat big
deal about the Playmate of the Year was the last one
left. It's the only thing fans of Playboy speculate
about any more.
I'm not saying this is a seachange, but at the
Playmate of the Year "coming out" party at the
mansion, they always take a picture of the lucky gal
in front of her cover. What will they do this year?
Take a picture of her in front of a cover she's not
on?
Topic: "James Kaminsky's devaluation of the Playmate
of the Year"
Discuss.
Brian Wallace
P.S. I could see this if there was a sudden change
of mind regarding the Playmate of the Year. But as
we know, it's been accepted that it's Christina Santi-
ago for months.
P.P.S. The preview picture at the end of the May
issue is NOT in the June Playmate of the Year pic-
torial which supports my theory that that photo
is of Michelle Rodgers.
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com