To: pml1@yahoogroups.com From: Mark Tomlonson Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 23:04:22 -0400 Subject: [PML1] CC: Julianna Young In Julianna Young's centerfold (November 1993) she's kneeling on a bed. Looking good, looking good in a picture, looking good naked and looking good naked in a picture are four different things, and each one represents an increase in rarity. Not every woman who looks good in person looks good naked in a picture. I'm mystified why this photo was selected as the gatefold and why Julianna was selected as a Playmate. She looks like she has the kind of earthy sensuality that I would love to wake up in bed next to, but that's a feeling that comes across only when looking at the entire range of portfolio shots. It is completely absent in the centerfold, and hard to find in any single photo. The centerfold strikes me as just plain ugly. Having Julianna lean back was the worst possible choice for her. Every other posture shown in the portfolio looks much better. Her breasts look terrible in this pose. They've taken on a line that makes them look like two amorphous lumps of flesh. No other body part looks much better, including her expression. There are some wonderful looks in her other photos, but not here. Photographers: Stephen Wayda, Arny Freytag Scoring: Pin-up: 0.0 Erotic: 0.0 Artistic: 1.5 Overall: 0.2 out of 4.0 Cyber Club Portfolio Photo I like better than the Centerfold: #1 is the best, but any of them would be an improvement. http://cyber.playboy.com/members/playmates/files/1993/11/centerfold.html http://cyber.playboy.com/members/playmates/files/1993/11/01-lrg.html Mark Tomlonson Kalamazoo MI